# eUSD Revenue Share - Historical view **URL:** \ **Category:** Electronic Dollar (eUSD)\ **Created:** [July 28, 2025, 11:26am UTC](https://forum.reserve.org/t/eusd-revenue-share-historical-view/1226 "2025-07-28T11:26:54Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 15
**Author:** ![0xJMG](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forum.reserve.org/0xjmg/32/1104_2.png) [@0xJMG](https://forum.reserve.org/u/0xJMG)\ **Post date:** [August 11, 2025, 5:17pm UTC](https://forum.reserve.org/t/eusd-revenue-share-historical-view/1226/15 "2025-08-11T17:17:50Z")
> [@Sawyer](#): > > if we look back at the revenue earned in Q2 with bi-weekly rebalances we have a current distribution of $24,176. If the frequency of these proposals were to drop to quarterly we’d see their revenue for this period drop to ~$13,538. @Sawyer I would like to see the spreadsheet data and calcs on the quoted math above. As previously metioned we should be running the math on a sufficiently large dataset of ~6 months of eUSD TVL comparing monthly vs twice monthly rev share changes, apples to apples same periods, net same amount of days. I want to be convinced but have not seen the data and calcs to back up the argument. Ham’s data, while I appreciate the effort, does not show this. If you pull the daily eUSD TVL, and eUSD TVL per wallet into a CSV, I am happy to work with you to create this apples to apples comparison. As previously mentioned, I support eUSD rev share to fintechs. I do not support the current frequency of changes without more detailed rationales from recipients. I remain concerned about eUSD governor fatigue and decreasing overcollateralization without seeing a quantified benefit. Thank you for championing eUSD for all the stakeholders. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.reserve.org/t/eusd-revenue-share-historical-view/1226)._