# \[IP\] Revenue Share Programme - Fintech Revenue Share Adjustment

**URL:** <https://forum.reserve.org/t/ip-revenue-share-programme-fintech-revenue-share-adjustment/1463>\
**Category:** Electronic Dollar (eUSD)\
**Created:** [March 3, 2026, 9:57am UTC](https://forum.reserve.org/t/ip-revenue-share-programme-fintech-revenue-share-adjustment/1463 "2026-03-03T09:57:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Raphael\_Anode](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forum.reserve.org/raphael_anode/32/1100_2.png) [@Raphael\_Anode](https://forum.reserve.org/u/Raphael_Anode)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2026, 2:52pm UTC](https://forum.reserve.org/t/ip-revenue-share-programme-fintech-revenue-share-adjustment/1463/2 "2026-03-04T14:52:20Z")

</div>

Given the amount of headwind that original agreement has received so far this seems like a win-win way forward.

From the FinTech’s perspective I’d value dependability, i.e. the assurance that no further reductions are planned, or if they are bound to happen have long lead times.  
I trust the current governance process to offer that, given that this discussion has been ongoing for more than a year now. But do want to point this out.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.reserve.org/t/ip-revenue-share-programme-fintech-revenue-share-adjustment/1463)._
