# \[REPORT\] ETH+ Liquidity Analysis Q4 2025

**URL:** <https://forum.reserve.org/t/report-eth-liquidity-analysis-q4-2025/1247>\
**Category:** ETH+ Reports\
**Created:** [September 17, 2025, 2:33pm UTC](https://forum.reserve.org/t/report-eth-liquidity-analysis-q4-2025/1247 "2025-09-17T14:33:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pete](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forum.reserve.org/pete/32/520_2.png) [@pete](https://forum.reserve.org/u/pete)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2025, 3:41pm UTC](https://forum.reserve.org/t/report-eth-liquidity-analysis-q4-2025/1247/7 "2025-09-30T15:41:38Z")

</div>

> [@ham](#):
>
> I did consider OETH before writing this proposal but I feel Akshat’s concerns remain. For OETH to have any sizeable impact on yield, diversification or liquididty an allocation of 10% or would have to be considered. An allocation of this size however would mean ETHplus would be holding ~20% of the entire OETH TVL and I find this risk intolerable.

I think ramping up an allocation of OETH would be the best path forward for including OETH in ETH+, if the main concern is percentage of total TVL held in ETH+. Starting at 3000 ETH would make the percentage of the total OETH TVL held in ETH+ 7.5%, which is less than half that of the total sfrxETH TVL currently held in ETH+ (16.8%)

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.reserve.org/t/report-eth-liquidity-analysis-q4-2025/1247)._
