I think this initiative combined with the Rangers and Vanguard program would create a compelling incentive for more and broader governance participation. It now all comes down to execution. I am not in a position to lead this in any way, but I am very much willing to dedicate 7 hours a week to help get this and the Rangers and Vanguard program off the ground. One other thing still: incentivizing is not the only thing that helps increase and sustain governance participation. The other thing is actually taking the governance feedback and discussion in this forum seriously. The recent lack of discussion around the resulting RSR seizure in the hyUSD basket change and subsequent questions related to eUSD proposals illustrate this: multiple people have had to asked in- and outside this forum multiple times about root causes and whether the same could happen with the proposed eUSD basket change in the forum proposal. I believe this was a valid question that was disregarded here in the forum and the proposal simply closed and moved to onchain voting stage ([IP] eUSD Collateral Basket Change Proposal 3 - #2 by R72). Incentivizing combined with truly embracing and completing forum discussions is a powerful way of increasing governance participation and dedication.
1 Like