# \[RFC\] Collateral Basket Change Proposal: Adding Wrapped OUSD (wOUSD) to the eUSD Collateral Basket

**URL:** <https://forum.reserve.org/t/rfc-collateral-basket-change-proposal-adding-wrapped-ousd-wousd-to-the-eusd-collateral-basket/1617>\
**Category:** Electronic Dollar (eUSD)\
**Created:** [August 25, 2026, 2:42pm UTC](https://forum.reserve.org/t/rfc-collateral-basket-change-proposal-adding-wrapped-ousd-wousd-to-the-eusd-collateral-basket/1617 "2026-08-25T14:42:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![0xd15co](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forum.reserve.org/0xd15co/32/926_2.png) [@0xd15co](https://forum.reserve.org/u/0xd15co)\
**Post date:** [September 2, 2026, 9:49am UTC](https://forum.reserve.org/t/rfc-collateral-basket-change-proposal-adding-wrapped-ousd-wousd-to-the-eusd-collateral-basket/1617/11 "2026-09-02T09:49:34Z")

</div>

USD3 is a better home for this than eUSD, and I would personally be open to adding wOUSD there.

The real constraint, as with eUSD, is integration, not delegate appetite. We need a reviewed plugin, and ABC Labs would have to audit it and add it to Reserve. Coding the plugin is one thing; that integration work by the team is not something governors can vote into existence.

Once wOUSD is fully integrated with Reserve, I would vote to add it to the USD3 basket at a conservative weight. Until then I would keep the conversation here rather than turning this into a USD3 basket vote.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.reserve.org/t/rfc-collateral-basket-change-proposal-adding-wrapped-ousd-wousd-to-the-eusd-collateral-basket/1617)._