# \[RFC\] Introducing ETH+

**URL:** <https://forum.reserve.org/t/rfc-introducing-eth/386>\
**Category:** ETH+ RFC\
**Created:** [April 15, 2023, 9:01am UTC](https://forum.reserve.org/t/rfc-introducing-eth/386 "2023-04-15T09:01:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Larry](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forum.reserve.org/larry/32/158_2.png) [@Larry](https://forum.reserve.org/u/Larry)\
**Post date:** [April 17, 2023, 6:26pm UTC](https://forum.reserve.org/t/rfc-introducing-eth/386/14 "2023-04-17T18:26:13Z")

</div>

Thank you for creating this @Eridian - it’ll be a big win for both the Reserve and ETH Staking communities 🤝

My 2 gwei on the revenue split for RSR stakers is that **5% is the strictly better option** given the compeititive landscape. With 5%, we are on par with Index Coop on a fee basis. This ensures that users do not face a cost disadvantage by going with ETH+ and do not have to decide on this basis. So all things being equal, ETH+ has a clear competitive edge with overcollateralization that makes it tough for anyone to have a strong case for going elsewhere.

Given @tbrent’s great points on what RSR overcollateralization is meant to cover, we are comfortably covered for the anticipated scenarios at 5% revenue to RSR, and so there’s little compromise on this aspect of ETH+'s offering either.

It’s a win-win here 😄

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.reserve.org/t/rfc-introducing-eth/386)._