Hi!
Firstly, I wanted to congratulate the eUSD team for the high quality of their written communications, and all the discussion participants for this vibrant conversation.
In an effort to help governance proposal clarity and following the reccommended naming conventions published in the forum by StableLab, we modified the title of the proposal to clearly display [RFC] (between square brackets) at the beginning of the title.
In addition, we tagged the post in the subcategory eUSD RFC to make it clearer for new users.
In RFC proposals, a final poll is highly reccommended, as a positive acceptance (>25%) would give way to the next governance step of creating an Improvement Proposal (IP). We leave it up to the creator of the post to include this final poll.
We encourage the eUSD team to adopt these conventions to keep a good [RFC] and [IP] record track.
Reccommended proposal guidelines: Naming convention for RFCs and IPs
In addition, this proposal has yet to be published for onchain voting.