Interesting to see zero critique or discussion on objective, granular data and conclusions posted in this thread 2 weeks ago.
In this year-long eUSD dataset linked above, the Biweekly End rev share method (current process) is suboptimal for recipients vs alternatives. Regrettably, the high-frequency governance changes have also proven costly to eUSD brand building, TVL growth and exhausting for governors, leaving company and affiliate wallets as the voting majority.
For anyone stumbling on this thread, more context is in the post and comments.
The evidence suggests eUSD isn’t a decentralized public good but instead prioritizing an Ugly Cash agenda, probably just its vc fundraising tour. Disheartening for the long term health of the RSR community, but revealing.
Like others who found the concerning gap between eUSD image and substance, I’ve unstaked. Best of luck.