Confirmed: Initial Delegation Amounts and First Delegates

We made it! After the initial set of six intrepid delegates stepped forward and self-coordinated to distribute the four relevant DTFs among them for top notch coverage, we now also confirmed the delegation amounts.

Which means: We’re ready to go!

What is the Reserve Recognized Delegate Program

The initial three month run will start on April 1 and run through June 30.
ABC Labs and Confusion Capital will delegate 60% of their stRSR on four DTFs:

  1. bsdETH
  2. ETH+
  3. eUSD
  4. USD3

The initial set of Recognized Delegates are, in alphabetical order:

  • 0xd15co - covering eUSD and USD3
  • Braden - covering ETH+ and bsdETH
  • Eureka - covering USD3 and bsdETH
  • Ham - covering ETH+ and eUSD
  • R72 - covering USD3 and eUSD
  • Zeb - covering ETH+ and bsdETH

Each DTF is covered by three delegates, which will help ensure a diversity of opinions and high governance security through more watchful eyes.

While these six are the first delegates in Reserve, there is no barrier to entry for further delegates, and nothing stopping stakers from delegating their voting power to one of the six or others. Quite to the contrary this is highly encouraged.

How much stRSR will be delegated?

Delegation amounts are set at 60% of the total holdings of ABC Labs and Confusion Capital combined, which greatly reduces the voting power of these two organizations while allowing them to meaningfully articulate their positions.

The amounts are:

eUSD

  • Total ABC/CC voting power (percent of staked RSR) = 18%
  • Average quorum multiple reached = ~130%
  • Percent to delegate = 10.6% (=60% of ABC/CC staked RSR)
  • Tokens to delegate = 239.6M steUsdRSR (79.87M per delegate covering)

ETH+

  • Total ABC/CC voting power (percent of staked RSR) = 9%
  • Average quorum multiple reached = ~187%
  • Percent to delegate = 5.4% (=60% of ABC/CC staked RSR)
  • Tokens to delegate = 47.5M stEth+RSR (15.83M per delegate covering)

bsdETH

  • Total ABC/CC voting power (percent of staked RSR) = 7%
  • Average quorum multiple reached = ~252%
  • Percent to delegate = 4.2% (=60% of ABC/CC staked RSR)
  • Tokens to delegate = 5.8M stbsdEthRSR (1.93M per delegate covering)

USD3

  • Total ABC/CC voting power (percent of staked RSR) = 19%
  • Average quorum multiple reached = ~197%
  • Percent to delegate = 11.4% (=60% of ABC/CC staked RSR)
  • Tokens to delegate = 57.3M stusd3RSR (19.1M per delegate covering)

Or as a table:

One thing to point out here is just how little voting power ABC Labs and Confusion Capital actually hold when compared to some of the top DeFi protocols out there. (Not naming any names, but look for an A and a U)

Delegate compensation and evaluation

Delegate compensation will be $250 / month in $RSR. A token of appreciation, but not enough to fight over.

Performance requirements to receive compensation:

  • Minimum 90% vote participation across all proposals on delegated products.
  • 100% of votes cast must include a posted rationale in the delegate’s forum thread.
  • Meaningful forum engagement, measured by read time and likes received.

Consequences for underperformance:

  • After one month of failing to meet requirements: a warning.
  • After two consecutive months: undelegation and removal from the recognized delegates tier.

Performance analytics

Anode will publish the first performance analytics post shortly before May 1, and analyze if delegate are eligible for compensation.

A new era of Reserve Governance has just begun, and with a team of delegates like that, we’re off to a really good start.

7 Likes

Great! Small correction: we decided my focus would be on eUSD and USD3, not on ETH+.

3 Likes

Thanks for seeing this initiative through @Raphael_Anode, we look forward to participating in Reserve governance.

1 Like

This is now corrected. Thanks for the heads up

1 Like

1st month is complete. How do we feel about it? @Raphael_Anode @R72 @Sixty @Braden @ham @0xd15co

Personally, thought the start was slow due to delegation delays. Luckily there were no ETH+ or bsdETH votes during that time.

Have voted on the 1 vote for ETH+. Gave thoughts. Still waiting for @griffpeer and @ivanhalen0x to give theirs on bsdETH and ETH+ as multiple potential action points arose, but the bottleneck seemed to be on their side.

How was it on the eUSD and USD3 front gents?

2 Likes

I’ve documented my votes and rationale in my delegate platform thread here and will continue to do so. All in all, I’d say I’m learning quite a bit now that I’m more involved in how proposals are created and executed. Overall, it’s definitely a net positive for me.

1 Like

Perfect. I was thinking since delegation mostly didn’t fully happen till Mid April, I’d do the first round of analytics on May 15th.

Let me know if you disagree with this. We’d have a cadence from 15-15 each month. So mid month to mid month.

2 Likes

Voted on both eUSD proposals and provided my rationale in the respective proposal threads. Provided proof-of-onchain-vote there as well. I look back positively on the first month of this trial period. It may perhaps not be fully clear and apparent to everyone, but this has been a significant and important step towards decentralized governance. Far less options for single individuals and/or entities to push through a proposal than before. It feels good to be able to contribute to that in a small but hopefully meaningful way.

2 Likes

As I did put in work, time and effort even during the first weeks, there is a side of my that feels weird that first month of the 3 months isn’t done.

However, if any of our delegates missed a vote due to us counting from the beginning, that would be totally unreasonable, since it was not the fault of the delegators for not having voting power, so that would be a lot more important than my feelings. So yes this makes sense.

I think that is well put. Likely, and even hopefully, our delegation work is fairly boring and steady. But by being there we are able to protect governance of centralization and takeovers. Something that might only be noticed in the long run.

2 Likes

Couldn’t agree more. If we can sustain this level of engagement for the entire trial this will be one of the most successful shifts towards decentralisation the Reserve Protocol has taken to date. The forum is already seeing richer discussions, new contributors are coming in and the increased oversight is already contributing to protocol safety. Safe to say I think it’s been a success so far.

1 Like

Impressive work Rangers. Getting started is often the hardest part and now thats a memory.

Appreciate that @zeb flagged a little helpful critique to build on. Hope others will do same.

The fist weeks will be counted, I think this is only fair. Just so we have everyone on board for the first “month” the month will be six weeks. Then a regular month until July 15, when we’ll do a retro of the pilot.

Does that make sense?