This is crucially important. Just last month has seen a deluge of governance attacks. While a closer look at payload is usally more than enough to identify an attack as such, legible ENS proposer names + a forum history of the proposal that matches the payload are MUCH better checks. This can still be done at speed. A single day on the forum is enough.
These proposals usually don’t appear out of the ether, but get developed for some time. Announcing the intention is enough to let voters and delegates know what’s coming.
See our push to unify governance flows for ALL DTFs here: Standardizing DTF Governance Flows & Moving Toward Permissioned Governance
This includes optimistic governance DTFs too.
In lieu of this being adopted we will be looking to get a list of known proposers published as soon as possible.