Ham Delegate Platform

RFCs Posted

This section highlights all the RFCs I have posted since my last delegation platform update. It includes links and the RFC summary.

[RFC] eUSD Revenue Share Programme Update 09-04-2026

An update to the existing ongoing proposal of sharing eUSD Revenue with participating fintechs, Ugly Cash and Sentz. The proposed proposal, if enacted, would update the Revenue Share in order to maintain compliance with the rules of the original revenue share proposal and the subsequent revenue share update proposal which saw 10% of Fintech Revenues redirected to stRSR holders.

Original Revenue Share Programme Proposal.

Fintech Revenue Share Adjustment (90/10) Proposal.

Governance Judgement and RFC Commentary

A record of my direct engagement with RFCs including praise, criticism and constructive challenge since my last update. These comments are shared to demonstrate how I evaluate proposals and where I believe the protocol should or should not evolve in the future.

Nil of note.

Implementation Proposal Votes

[eUSD] Revenue Share Programme Update 26-02-2026

Vote: FOR

[eUSD] Revenue Share Programme Update 12-03-2026

Vote: FOR

[eUSD] Revenue Share Programme Update 26-03-2026

Vote: FOR

[eUSD] Revenue Share Programme Update 09-04-2026

Vote: FOR

In favour for all these proposals as they are aligned with the mandate set out in the original revenue share framework and the subsequent adjustment. I supported these revenue updates so FinTech compensation accurately reflects the eUSD balances they hold.

[eUSD] Revenue Share Programme - Fintech Revenue Share Adjustment

Vote: FOR

A long overdue proposal that better aligns compensation for stRSR holders with their role in supporting eUSD. As this adjustment compresses fintech margins, focus should now shift to improving the basket’s yield profile to maintain competitiveness with the DeFi risk free rate in order to support them to keep increasing their balances held.

[eUSD] 4.2.0 Upgrade

I voted for this proposal as it upgrades eUSD to the latest supported protocol release, reducing security and operational risk from running outdated code. It also aligns eUSD with audited features that improve safety and future governance flexibility without changing the current basket or parameters.

1 Like

Since Last Update

  • Published five long-form quarterly and liquidity reports across ETHplus, eUSD, USD3 and bsdETH covering liquidity conditions, collateral risk, yield compression, distribution trends and governance activity across the Yield DTF ecosystem.
  • Posted 3 RFCs across ETHplus and eUSD
  • Engaged extensively in ETHplus Q2 rebalance discussions
  • Maintained 100% IP vote participation voting on protocol upgrades and revenue share updates

Quarterly Reporting

Alongside direct governance participation and proposal discussion, I also completed a number of long-form quarterly reports across the Yield DTF ecosystem. These reports aim to provide governors, stakeholders and potential allocators with transparent updates on protocol performance, liquidity conditions, collateral risk, distribution trends and governance activity, while also helping inform future governance direction and rebalance discussions.

ETHplus Quarterly Report Q1 2026

Published ETHplus’ Q1 2026 quarterly report covering supply stabilisation following the Q4 deleveraging event, growth in wallet activity and transfer metrics, governance execution and the emergence of new distribution channels such as the Tulipa ETHplus vault. The report also highlighted improving diversification following the Q1 rebalance and the growing importance of sustainable, unincentivised liquidity.

ETHplus Liquidity Analysis April 2026

Produced a comprehensive liquidity analysis assessing the mint and redemption liquidity of ETHplus and its constituent collateral assets. The report identified ETHx as the primary redemption bottleneck, highlighted worsening liquidity conditions across the wider LST sector and helped inform the subsequent ETHplus Q2 rebalance discussion.

eUSD Quarterly Report Q1 2026

Published eUSD’s Q1 2026 quarterly report examining the protocol’s ongoing transition from incentive-driven DeFi growth toward a fintech-led distribution model. The report highlighted continued growth in UglyCash balances, contraction across DeFi markets following incentive removals and the implications of the updated 90/10 revenue share framework for stRSR holders.

bsdETH Quarterly Report Q1 2026

Published bsdETH’s Q1 2026 quarterly report focused on the protocol’s stabilisation following the sharp deleveraging event observed in late 2025. The report covered recovering ETH-denominated supply, improving transfer activity and the role of Morpho and emerging index DTF integrations in rebuilding long-term distribution.

USD3 Quarterly Report Q1 2026

Published USD3’s Q1 2026 quarterly report analysing the protocol’s transition away from incentive-driven growth toward a smaller but more organic baseline. The report examined declining DeFi liquidity, basket yield compression, the loss of Morpho distribution and the need for renewed basket optimisation and distribution expansion going forward.

RFCs Posted

This section highlights all the RFCs I have posted since my last delegation platform update. It includes links and the RFC summary.

[RFC] eUSD Revenue Share Programme Update 23-04-2026

[RFC] eUSD Revenue Share Programme Update 07-05-2026

Updates to the existing ongoing proposal of sharing eUSD Revenue with participating fintechs, Ugly Cash and Sentz. The proposed proposal, if enacted, updates the Revenue Share in order to maintain compliance with the rules of the original revenue share proposal and the subsequent revenue share update proposal which saw 10% of Fintech Revenues redirected to stRSR holders.

Original Revenue Share Programme Proposal.

Fintech Revenue Share Adjustment (90/10) Proposal.

[RFC] ETHplus Rebalance Proposal Q2 2026

The April 2026 ETHplus Liquidity Analysis highlighted a growing misalignment between the current collateral basket and the ETHplus mandate. Most notably, ETHx has become the primary redemption bottleneck, causing basket slippage to exceed the mandated 0.5% threshold at roughly 5,000 ETH. At the same time, the recent increase in the ETHplus take rate from 5% to 10% has pushed holder yield below the stETH benchmark, while rising concentration within individual collateral assets requires closer monitoring against the mandated 10% dependency limits.

This proposal seeks to address these issues through a rebalance that removes rETH, reduces ETHx exposure, increases weETH and frxETH allocations and maintains stETH at 50%. The proposed basket improves redemption capacity and holder yield while remaining diversified across multiple ETH staking protocols.

While the rebalance temporarily places ETHplus above the mandated dependency threshold for frxETH, this is expected to normalise as externally incentivised looping positions continue to unwind and ETHplus supply contracts further in the coming weeks. Given this dynamic, execution is recommended only once these positions have largely exited.

Metric Current Basket (April 2026) Proposed Basket Reason for Change
Redemption Slippage Threshold Breach ~5,000 ETH Redeemed ~7,000 ETH Redeemed Improved Redemption Capacity
Holder Yield 2.30% 2.39% +9bps
Blended Basket Yield 2.55% 2.65% +10bps
stETH Allocation 50% 50% Unchanged
weETH Allocation 22% 25% Increased (+3%)
rETH Allocation 10% 0% Reduced (-10%)
frxETH Allocation 10% 20% Increased (+10%)
ETHx Allocation 8% 5% Reduced (-3%)
Diversification Profile 0.68 0.65 Slight Reduction
Basket Share of frxETH TVL 5.45% 10.89% Increased dependency risk (likely transient as incentivised LPs exit ETHplus positions)
Mint Slippage Threshold Breach Within mandate past tested range ~2,500 ETH Minted Slight deterioration versus mandate amid weaker market-wide liquidity

Governance Judgement and RFC Commentary

A record of my direct engagement with RFCs including praise, criticism and constructive challenge since my last update. These comments are shared to demonstrate how I evaluate proposals and where I believe the protocol should or should not evolve in the future.

ETHplus Rebalance Proposal Q2 2026

I remained heavily engaged throughout discussion of the ETHplus Q2 rebalance proposal, particularly around the proposed removal of rETH and consideration of alternative collateral assets such as OETH. My commentary focused on balancing liquidity resilience, redemption capacity, yield optimisation and dependency risk against the ETHplus mandate. In particular, I highlighted growing concerns around ETHx acting as the primary bottleneck of the ETHplus redemption curve.

Around rETH, I acknowledged Rocket Pool’s strong decentralisation ethos and upcoming technical improvements, including the 4 ETH bond reduction and direct redemption roadmap, while also expressing concern around the fragility of its current liquidity profile following the Balancer exploit and rsETH deleveraging event. I also noted that the current 30d yield profile sits around ~2.1%, below the stETH benchmark and weaker than competing basket constituents. While the Rocket Pool team expects improvement toward year end, I felt the current basket should prioritise prevailing liquidity and yield conditions rather than forward expectations alone.

I also engaged extensively around the potential inclusion of OETH. While I recognise the attractiveness of its tighter peg mechanics, higher yield profile and growing DVT-based staking architecture, I ultimately expressed caution around inclusion at this stage. My concerns centred around the relatively small backed supply, AMO complexity and the limited evidence of how the system behaves during periods of direct protocol stress.

Overall, I support rebalance direction focused on improving redemption capacity and restoring closer alignment with the ETHplus mandate, while remaining cautious around execution timing and temporary dependency breaches. Further analysis will be required in early June to assess how the ongoing unwind of incentivised ETHplus positions has progressed, at which point an updated collateral basket and allocation profile can be considered based on the prevailing supply, liquidity and dependency conditions.

Implementation Proposal Votes

[eUSD] Revenue Share Programme Update 23-04-2026

Vote: FOR

[eUSD] Revenue Share Programme Update 07-05-2026

Vote: FOR

In favour for both of these proposals as they are aligned with the mandate set out in the original revenue share framework and the subsequent adjustment. I supported these revenue updates so FinTech compensation accurately reflects the eUSD balances they hold.

[ETHplus] 4.2.0 Upgrade

Vote: FOR

I voted for this proposal as it upgrades ETHplus to the latest supported protocol release, reducing security and operational risk from running outdated code. It also aligns ETHplus with audited features that improve safety and future governance flexibility without changing the current basket or parameters.

4 Likes

Since Last Update

● Authored and posted the RFC for ratification of the eUSD Mandate & Methodology V2 and Initial Eligible Collateral Universe, establishing a formal framework for collateral approval, diversification and portfolio construction while helping separate collateral approval decisions from basket management decisions.

● Authored and posted a CMC20 RFC proposing an extension of the basket governance review, voting and execution process from 48 to 72 hours to strengthen governance security following recent attacks against Reserve ecosystem Index DTFs.

● Remained actively engaged throughout discussion of the ETHplus Q2 rebalance proposal, contributing commentary on liquidity requirements, yield optimisation, indirect collateral exposures and the trade-offs between portfolio efficiency and redemption capacity.

● Participated in governance discussions surrounding eUSD overcollateralization requirements, highlighting the balance between risk management, governance complexity and product predictability as eUSD expands its fintech distribution.

● Continued to maintain 100% implementation proposal vote participation across Yield DTFs.

RFCs Posted

This section highlights all the RFCs I have posted since my last delegation platform update. It includes links and the RFC summary.

[eUSD RFC] Revenue Share Programme Update 21-05-2026

[eUSD RFC] Revenue Share Programme Update 04-06-2026

Updates to the existing ongoing proposal of sharing eUSD Revenue with participating fintechs, Ugly Cash and Sentz. The proposed proposal, if enacted, updates the Revenue Share in order to maintain compliance with the rules of the original revenue share proposal and the subsequent revenue share update proposal which saw 10% of Fintech Revenues redirected to stRSR holders.

Original Revenue Share Programme Proposal.

Fintech Revenue Share Adjustment (90/10) Proposal.

[CMC20 RFC] Extension of Onchain Voting and Execution Process of Basket Governance

Authored an RFC proposing an extension of the basket governance review period, voting period and execution delay from a combined 48 hours to 72 hours.

The proposal seeks to strengthen governance security by providing governors, delegates and the core team with additional time to identify and respond to malicious proposals before execution. The recommendation follows recent attacks against Reserve ecosystem DTFs and reflects the growing importance of governance resilience as the ecosystem matures.

[RFC] Ratification of eUSD Mandate & Methodology V2 and Initial Eligible Collateral Universe

Authored an RFC seeking ratification of the updated eUSD Mandate & Methodology alongside an initial eligible collateral universe.

The proposal introduces a formal framework for collateral approval, diversification and portfolio construction while expanding the range of strategies available to improve risk-adjusted yield generation. The framework was developed following extensive discussion around concentration risk, dependency risk and portfolio construction within eUSD. A key objective was to clearly separate collateral approval from basket management decisions, providing governors with greater flexibility while ensuring future portfolio changes remain aligned with a transparent and well-defined mandate.

Governance Judgement and RFC Commentary

A record of my direct engagement with RFCs including praise, criticism and constructive challenge since my last update. These comments are shared to demonstrate how I evaluate proposals and where I believe the protocol should or should not evolve in the future.

ETHplus Rebalance Proposal Q2 2026

I remained actively engaged throughout discussion of the ETHplus Q2 rebalance proposal, particularly around the proposed removal of rETH, reduction of ETHx exposure and consideration of OETH as an alternative collateral asset.

A key area of discussion centred around how governors should interpret liquidity requirements following the significant contraction in ETHplus supply. I argued that portfolio construction should reflect current protocol conditions rather than historical supply levels and that, at ETHplus’ current size, improving holder yield was a higher priority than optimising for redemption scenarios larger than the entire circulating supply.

I also highlighted the importance of considering indirect exposures within the basket, noting that increasing frxETH results in a small increase in indirect stETH exposure. Governors should remain aware that direct allocations do not always represent a protocol’s true economic exposure and continue to monitor these dependencies during future rebalances.

Overall, I supported the proposed rebalance as a pragmatic step that improves yield, addresses ETHplus’ most significant liquidity bottleneck and allows governors to reassess basket composition as supply and market conditions continue to evolve.

Defining eUSD Overcollateralization

I participated in discussion surrounding the appropriate level of overcollateralization for eUSD as the proposed methodology expands the eligible collateral universe beyond traditional lending markets.

While I agreed that basket risk and overcollateralization are closely linked, I expressed reservations about introducing a formal stress-adjusted OC framework. My concern is that such an approach would require increasingly complex assumptions around basket risk, dependency failures and stressed RSR valuations, potentially shifting governance discussions away from portfolio construction and towards debates over risk models.

I also highlighted the importance of product predictability. As eUSD expands its fintech distribution, predictable basket management, yield generation and revenue sharing become increasingly important for integrators building around the product.

For these reasons, I supported maintaining high-level guidance around OC requirements within the methodology while preserving governor discretion when evaluating whether overcollateralization remains appropriate for a given basket composition.

Implementation Proposal Votes

[eUSD] Revenue Share Programme Update 21-05-2026

Vote: FOR

[eUSD]Revenue Share Programme Update 04-06-2026

Vote: FOR

In favour for the above eUSD proposals as they are aligned with the mandate set out in the original revenue share framework and the subsequent 90/10 adjustment. I supported these revenue updates so FinTech compensation accurately reflects the eUSD balances they hold.

[ETHplus] Rebalance Proposal Q2 2026 - Step 1

Vote: FOR

I supported this proposal as an interim rebalance that better reflects ETHplus’ current size and liquidity profile following the significant contraction in supply over recent months. The proposal improves holder yield, addresses the basket’s primary liquidity bottleneck in ETHx and maintains diversification across multiple ETH staking protocols.

1 Like

Since Last Update

● Participated in governance discussions surrounding eUSD overcollateralization requirements, highlighting the balance between risk management, governance complexity and product predictability as eUSD expands its fintech distribution.

● Authored and posted the ETHplus Liquidity Analysis - July 2026, helping to guide governors, stakeholders and potential allocators with transparent updates ETHplus liquidity conditions over the coming quarter. This report also heavily supported the ETHplus Q2 Interim report, posted after the completion of the first step and prior to the proposed second step, ensuring that the first step was a success before proceeding.

● Shelved the eUSD Ratification of eUSD Mandate & Methodology V2 and Initial Eligible Collateral Universe RFC after it the protocol team found significant issues with intergrating Morpho V2 vaults into the Yield Protocol.

● Continued to maintain 100% implementation proposal vote participation across Yield DTFs.

Reporting

Alongside direct governance participation and proposal discussion, I also completed a long-form liquidity report for ETHplus. These reports aim to provide governors, stakeholders and potential allocators with transparent updates on protocol performance, liquidity conditions, collateral risk, distribution trends and governance activity, while also helping inform future governance direction and rebalance discussions.

[REPORT] ETHplus Liquidity Analysis - July 2026

Summary

  • ETHplus supply has continued to contract, prompting a reduction in the report’s tested liquidity range from 50,000 ETH to 5,000 ETH while providing a more granular view of current liquidity conditions.

  • Protocol minting remains highly efficient across the tested range, while redemption liquidity remains broadly unchanged following the first stage of the Q2 rebalance.

  • The first step of the Q2 rebalance and noticeable improvements in the redemption curves of frxETH and weETH, partially offsetting continued weakness in ETHx and rETH.

  • Concentration risk has fallen significantly as ETHplus TVL has contracted, reducing the protocol’s share of underlying collateral TVLs and supporting greater portfolio flexibility.

  • ETHplus continues to underperform its stETH benchmark, but the yield gap has narrowed from 7% to 3%, representing a meaningful improvement in methodology compliance.

RFCs Posted

This section highlights all the RFCs I have posted since my last delegation platform update. It includes links and the RFC summary.

[eUSD RFC] Revenue Share Programme Update 19-06-2026

[eUSD RFC] Revenue Share Programme Update 02-07-2026

Updates to the existing ongoing proposal of sharing eUSD Revenue with participating fintechs, Ugly Cash and Sentz. The proposed proposal, if enacted, updates the Revenue Share in order to maintain compliance with the rules of the original revenue share proposal and the subsequent revenue share update proposal which saw 10% of Fintech Revenues redirected to stRSR holders.

Original Revenue Share Programme Proposal.

Fintech Revenue Share Adjustment (90/10) Proposal.

Governance Judgement and RFC Commentary

A record of my direct engagement with RFCs including praise, criticism and constructive challenge since my last update. These comments are shared to demonstrate how I evaluate proposals and where I believe the protocol should or should not evolve in the future.

[RFC] Ratification of eUSD Mandate & Methodology V2 and Initial Eligible Collateral Universe

Unfortunately, upon review by Reserve’s protocol team it was deemed that Morpho V2 vaults are not suitable for the yield protocol. There was a number of reasons for this but the most significant was Curator-flippable management fees, any curator which flips fees on their vaults drops ref-per-tok and triggers an immediate nuisance default, causing the protocol to go into unnecessary re-collatalisation auctions. Given the proposal was centred around the addition of Morpho V2 collaterals the proposal has now been shelved while more suitable collaterals are found.

Implementation Proposal Votes

eUSD Revenue Share Programme Update 19-06-2026

Vote: FOR

eUSD Revenue Share Programme Update 02-07-2026

Vote: FOR

In favour for the above eUSD proposals as they are aligned with the mandate set out in the original revenue share framework and the subsequent 90/10 adjustment. I supported these revenue updates so FinTech compensation accurately reflects the eUSD balances they hold.

1 Like