@Sawyer ,
Glad you are motivated for Reserve’s 2026 PMF goals.
Consider if your time and the community’s resources had been focused 6–12 months ago on PMF, instead of burned on rev-share governance for eUSD, whose TVL is unchanged.
Difficult to understand why you are stuck on bi-weekly rev share changes unless you’ve been privately directed to do so for some reason.
I’ve reread your responses, and the issue is glaring. Your analysis only looks at a rolling 14-day window, even though eUSD TVL performance is flat year over year. Meanwhile, shifting shares between Ugly Cash, Sentz, and RSR stakers introduce ongoing shaving inefficiencies.
I’ve provided here analysis on 365 days of eUSD’s data (26x more, no pun intended). As I outlined in Sept 2025, the method for your calculations (bi weekly period ending) ranks 4th amongst seven options.
Here is the summary table you can find in AA:4 of the mentioned and linked spreadsheet.
The pennies difference in methods is actually immaterial. It would be easy to get about the same result for eUSD and RSR with 50 to 80% less work.
Sadly, this centralization display and distracting waste of time has been costly to the Reserve and eUSD brands, stakers and RSR.
If you and the Reserve community want more precision, there are three stronger options for calculating rev share.
If you and the Reserve community want more resources focused on DTF product market fit, then its an easy decision.
Imagine this gets sorted eventually. Final cost tbd.
I’ve moved on to other things.
.