[IP] eUSD Rev Share - Finale

Summary

First, I’d like to apologize for posting twice in the forums without clearly articulating my case. This post encompasses everything valuable I wish to contribute to the Reserve ecosystem.

To reiterate, I am requesting a 3% revenue share from eUSD as compensation for driving its growth, and monitoring risk. I prefer this approach over seeking a grant from Confusion Capital because I aim to make RToken ambassadorship my full-time job. Confusion Capital cannot provide recurring grants and a one-time grant wouldn’t enable me to replace the income from my current job.

In this post, I’ll demonstrate that a 3% revenue share from eUSD will not just cover costs, but will unlock value for RSR stakers that exceeds their investment.

What Value does 0xTomSawyer add to the Electronic Dollar

In the previous forum post as well as in my recent video update, I talk a lot about the work I’ve done and will continue to do. In this post I want to highlight why this work is critical for the success of eUSD.

Governance:
I constantly monitor eUSD’s risk, this allows for the safety of all of its users. This ensures that yield farmers and everyday people using Ugly Cash stay protected. A good example of this would be the increase to issuance and redemption throttles proposal. Without this proposal whales would’ve had to mint in smaller increments. This proposal allowed for the market cap of eUSD to grow at a quicker rate.

Marketing/Social Media:
I maintain eUSD’s visibility on data aggregators like DeFiLlama, and post about the opportunities on eUSD’s dedicated X account. This assures yield farmers are always exposed to eUSD’s high yield opportunities, thereby indirectly driving TVL growth.

Research:
I bring forward ideas like the basket composition RFC that increased the yield profile, as well as decreased the cost to mint. This directly increased the revenue for RSR stakers. Additionally, this has made eUSD a better product for yield farmers and Ugly Cash users.

Why does a 3% revenue share make sense?

I spend between 20 - 40 hours per week (and sometimes more) working in the Reserve ecosystem, on top of my current 9 - 5 that is 100% in-office.


Clockify Report 11/1-11/7

It’s difficult to break down how many of those hours are specifically dedicated to eUSD compared to other RTokens I contribute to: for instance the recent emergency collateral update proposal was work that was relevant to all USD based RTokens, whereas the collateral basket change proposal 2 was work that was only dedicated to eUSD.

With eUSD at a $22.6m market cap and with the current yields pulled from the register app the yearly salary for a 3% Rev Share would be about $33,000. This comes out to about $2800 per month and an hourly rate of about $16.30.

According to Glassdoor the average annual salary for a Web 3 research analyst is around $97,097. The salary range for a Web 3 Social Media Manager is $85,000 – $110,000. For DAO operations and governance specifically, the salary was variable, with compensation ranging from $84,000 – $150,000.

For a week where I spend 20 hours in the Reserve ecosystem and dedicate my time equally to three RTokens, this comes out to about seven hours per week spent on eUSD.

For a week where I spend about 40 hours in the Reserve Ecosystem with the majority of those hours dedicated to eUSD, that comes to about 20 hours per week for eUSD research, proposal-generating, marketing and outreach.

With 20 hours per week dedicated to eUSD, that would be the equivalent of $66,000 annually, significantly below the market rate according to Glassdoor. I am asking for $33,000 at current m-cap.

My goal is to become a full time RToken Ambassador. With the current revenue share from the RTokens I receive revenue from, it is not enough to go full time. If the eUSD Rev Share proposal passes, the additional approximate $33k yearly income gets me significantly closer to that goal of being able to replace my income.

However, I still wouldn’t feel comfortable leaving my day job, if rates were to suddenly go down or the market cap of the collective RTokens were to drastically drop, then the income I would be earning would go down.

If the market cap and yields were to grow significantly and I’m suddenly flush with capital above and beyond a salary I would be able to hire someone or multiple people — geared solely at growing eUSD in these four areas: Social, Research, Gov Ops, Outreach.

I plan on posting quarterly updates on the forums, not just for eUSD but for all RTokens. These reports will keep track of KPI’s like TVL, onchain metrics and relevant DeFi integrations.

Engagement strategy

How do you capture attention? I meet weekly with other RToken Champions and ABC Labs team to talk and prepare content, hold governance reviews, and plan and enact strategy.

These include monthly content and copywriting sessions with Starl3xx, custom graphic designs with Fennec, notifications for eUSD for easy engagement, and reply-guy work.

I communicate with ABC Labs team on co-marketing opportunities and I welcome and implement critical feedback in order to enhance the effectiveness of social feeds. I hire other graphic designers to create custom GIF memes (with my own money).

Who are the personas? DeFi Yield Farmers, specifically whales and potential FinTech partners, a massive opportunity for eUSD

Why do they care? Yield, earn a safe return on their money and stability(depeg protection)…

What’s the message? It’s simple, you can earn yield with eUSD on multiple chains with several different opportunities ranging from LP’ing, to supplying eUSD in a lending market.

Outside of Ugly Cash and Reserve Ecosystem participant holders, the majority of users are DeFi farmers. The goal is to expand that user base and compete with larger stables through education and outreach.

Other plans include expanding eUSD’s presence to the Farcaster ecosystem in Q1-25, which is crypto-native and offers additional marketing opportunities.

WAGBI

  • Yes, I support this proposal
  • No, I don’t believe Tom Sawyer should be compensated
0 voters
1 Like

As stated in my previous comment, I strongly believe in monetary recognition of Tom’s contributions. This new post in light of past feedback only cements this belief. He has demonstrated a capacity at directly addressing critical feedback, indicating the sufficiently ego-free, mature mindset that operating in a DAO often requires.

Tom is already an asset to eUSD and I am worried that another, more generous ecosystem would pick him up. He is a demonstrably competent and talented operator and his skillset will only be increasingly in demand. To “lock” him in would not only assist the asset in the ways detailed above but also may prevent the departure to someone whose contributions would not be easily replaced. While other candidates for this role exist, it would take them weeks or months to match Tom’s skills and they would certainly demand multiples more compensation.

I am mindful that this amount is capable of growing significantly if eUSD grows significantly. With this in mind, we should table another discussion on this topic in 6 months should Tom’s revenue share start to exceed the stated rough salary band of a DAO operator.

1 Like

Short answer: am in full support.

Long answer: i do believe the reserve ecosystem has reached a critical stage. While there has been significant growth since the launch of mainnet, it has somewhat stalled recently. The biggest chunk of the increase in marketcap stems from ETH+ growth and rising ETH prices, the stables / flatcoins (eUSD, hyUSD, WEB3) have mostly flatlined.
The initial approach of „Build it and they will come“ has clearly failed. If i remember correctly this was also stated by Nevin himself a couple of months back.
Furthermore the whole ecosystem is kind of an echochamber at the moment with the same people interacting with each other. There is little influx of what i would call „fresh blood“.

What the ecosystem needs right now is highly engaged, skilled and trusted individuals deeply embedded in the ecosystem to further push the narrative. As already stated above by @river0x , Tom is one of those individuals. Without his relentless efforts the ecosystem would not be anywhere near to where it is now. I think there is no need to further elaborate, Tom himself has given a very good overview over his contributions and everyone interested in Reserve should already know who he is and his role in the community. Him working full-time on the ecosystem could be a tipping point.

Risk: lower yield with no further growth of the ecosystem. Or in case the proposal is defeated: losing a key player.

Opportunity: sustainable growth of the Reserve ecosystem, especially in the area of stablecoins / flatcoins which in turn would have a positive impact on future returns.

This proposal has little downside but a lot of upside potential. IMHO, of course.

3 Likes

@Tom_hyUSD thank you for the proposal update!

I’m open to supporting this mutual growth opportunity if we set and agree on KPIs upfront, measure baselines at kickoff (when revenue sharing begins), and commit to written published quarterly updates with and explanations on what changed, and why.

Important to note: the support I mentioned here differs from what I shared in Discord, where I suggested outcomes first, then a governance tweak for eUSD revenue sharing later. But with a focus on mutual growth and good faith, this feels like a worthwhile bet for us all.

Here is a starter set of metrics I suggest considering:

  • eUSD TVL
  • eUSD TVL in Sentz
  • eUSD TVL in Ugly Cash
  • eUSD transactions on Ethereum
  • eUSD transactions on Base
  • eUSD addresses with positions on Morpho
  • eUSD addresses with positions on [Other Protocol]
  • eUSD TVL on Morpho
  • eUSD TVL on [Other Protocol]
  • Qualitative feedback from Sentz on eUSD usage
  • Qualitative feedback from Ugly Cash on eUSD usage
  • Fintech revenue share % as outlined by StableLab
  • X followers
  • X engagement rate
  • X impressions

The list may be too much, it may be too little–and is open to modification. eUSD governors should weigh in–an opportunity to coalition build voter support for the proposed IP.

1 Like

I’m strongly in favour of compensating Tom for his contributions to eUSD as mentioned previously he is a highly engaged, skilled and trusted individual who has demonstrated unwavering commitment to the ecosystem this has only become more apparent to me as I became more involved in championing ETH RTokens.

I agree with @0xJMG that quaterly reviews would level up the transparency of our work and it has been been regularly discussed during our weekly RToken meetings since. We are both motivated to bake this into our work and I think the the list you outline here is a good stepping off point.

I also echo @river0x concern that if we do not pass this proposal we will start to see a brain drain of our most active and diligent contributors. With this in mind and the mutual growth that rev share offers means that the benefits massively outweigh the risks of loosing Tom.

This proposal a no brainer for me, lets get Tom paid what he deserves so he can transparently continue engaging the existing community, on-boarding new entrants and growing the eUSD pie.

WAGBI

1 Like

I appreciate the support. I have tentatively removed Ugly Cash and Sentz. I do not know if I will be able to get that data. And I am not sure if that information should be shared at this time or not. For that reason I have revised the list below:

  • eUSD TVL
  • eUSD transactions on Ethereum
  • eUSD transactions on Base
  • eUSD addresses with positions on Morpho
  • eUSD addresses with positions on [Other Protocol]
  • eUSD TVL on Morpho
  • eUSD TVL on [Other Protocol]
  • Fintech revenue share % as outlined by StableLab
  • X followers
  • X engagement rate
  • X impressions

Agree cannot confirm with certainty Ugly Cash or Sentz will contribute to the discussion, but should still try even if its “reached out to them 10 times and got ghosted.”

Why this is important? you are giving a helpful pulse to the community so we can team-up and leverage different contacts you may not have to get the answer to the questions. United we stand and win.

If we do nothing on this front, we end up where we are right now. If we try, maybe we progress?

Excluding DEX trading pairs, what are the largest eUSD integrations after Ugly, Sentz and Morpho?

1 Like

I’m in favour of Tom getting revenue for his work for Reserve and also there’s a distinct lack of anyone else doing anything similar - and as James has stated reporting metrics is the way to show this is going as planned.

Sounds good to me as no one is more deserving. However, I would like to see this renewed every X months. Perhaps every quarter makes sense.

Head over to norzer.me if you need help with your SEO, website design, hosting, etc. needs. :slight_smile:

I can’t vote here, but I wanted to write something. Honestly, I’m just a little guy in the ecosystem, I spend my time talking to the French people in my Reserve community about what this project can bring tomorrow. I see you being very active Tom, I think all this is beyond my field of competence, but without even necessarily following everything you do, and seeing other people in the team supporting you, I think it’s fair that a useful investment for the future of the ecosystem should be rewarded / remunerated justly. So the little guy in me hopes you get a positive review, thanks for what you’re doing even if I don’t know you!

1 Like